So i have enabled ongoing screening for a case. How will get to know if i have enabled on going screening or not now for that case?
Does any api returns with yes/no if a case is enabled with ongoing screening?
For a deeper look into our World Check One API, look into:
So i have enabled ongoing screening for a case. How will get to know if i have enabled on going screening or not now for that case?
Does any api returns with yes/no if a case is enabled with ongoing screening?
Thank you for your query.
In order to check the status of the cases for ongoing screening, please use the API call - 'SEQ-case-investigate-case-details: Fetch full case details'. I am sharing the response of the API call below for your reference-
{ "caseId": "d3b813d6-2ec2-4a96-a40b-2eeb253044a4", "name": "John Doe", "providerTypes": [ "WATCHLIST" ], "customFields": [], "secondaryFields": [], "groupId": "0a3687cf-62d4-1350-98b5-300b00000008", "entityType": "INDIVIDUAL", "caseSystemId": "0a3687cf-6c28-192b-9b1c-16650077ce8d", "caseScreeningState": { "WATCHLIST": "ONGOING" }, "lifecycleState": "UNARCHIVED", "creator": { "userId": "0a3687cf-62d4-1350-98b5-300c00000046", "firstName": "Prabhjyot", "lastName": "Mandla", "fullName": "Prabhjyot Mandla", "email": "prabhjyot.mandla@thomsonreuters.com", "status": "ACTIVE" }, "modifier": { "userId": "0a3687cf-62d4-1350-98b5-300c00000046", "firstName": "Prabhjyot", "lastName": "Mandla", "fullName": "Prabhjyot Mandla", "email": "prabhjyot.mandla@thomsonreuters.com", "status": "ACTIVE" }, "assignee": null, "creationDate": "2019-08-08T08:30:15.190Z", "modificationDate": "2020-03-17T04:09:08.983Z", "nameTransposition": false, "outstandingActions": true }
Hope this answers your query.
That api basically is PUT method and returns nothing right?SEQ-case-ogs-enable: Enable ongoing screening for a case . I am using the same to enable the ongoing screening. But i need some inputs to show users if a ongoing screening is already enabled or not
@sandeepp.90 - The API call is - SEQ-case-investigate-case-details: Fetch full case details
I have corrected my comment in the above response.